blog.title

A vendor's 'GDPR-compliant' badge means nothing without the work behind it. We ran a full audit of our own codebase against the GDPR obligations that fall on a data processor — erasure, retention, sub-processors, EU runtime — and here's each item we closed, verified against the code.

Most live-translation tools replace you with a single robotic narrator. InterMIND keeps your voice: every participant hears the translation in the original speaker's own voice. Here is how the cascade does it — and why the voice sample is never stored.

Teams can translate a live meeting three ways — translated captions, the AI Interpreter agent, and human interpretation channels. What each needs, what it costs, and the limits that decide whether it fits your meeting.

Zoom can translate a live meeting three ways — translated captions, a beta voice translator, and human interpretation channels. How each works, what it costs, and the limits that decide whether it fits your meeting.

"GDPR-compliant" on a video tool's homepage means less than you think. Here's the plain-terms checklist of what it actually requires, where Zoom needs configuration, and an EU-runtime alternative built to translate.

Google Meet can translate a live meeting two ways — translated captions and the newer Gemini speech translation. Here's how each works, what they cost, and the one limit that decides whether they fit your meeting.

Real-time meeting translation lets everyone hear and read a call in their own language, live. What it is, how it actually works under the hood, and the questions to ask before you buy one.

A companion to our runtime map: not where your meeting runs, but what it's built from. The layer-by-layer stack — where we run our own code or open-source software, where we're pragmatic about proprietary SaaS, and why the engine most of your data flows through is our own code, with a public, BSD-licensed client SDK.

A vendor-by-vendor map of which external services touch your meeting, where they execute, and what data passes through each — including the post-meeting AI steps, all of which now run on EU processors.

Aviation regulators mandated it after Tenerife and Avianca. Medical literature quantifies it down to error counts per patient encounter. Forty years of international-business research documents the same mechanism in the boardroom. Why partial fluency in a shared language is worse than no shared language at all — with the data.

Every vendor quotes one language count. We can't, because translation isn't one product. Here is the per-surface breakdown for InterMIND — what is filtered, why, and what we publish on the website.

There is no "the translation" in InterMIND. There are four pipelines — voice, chat, notes, documents — each with its own engine, latency budget, and quality envelope. This is what actually happens between the moment you speak and the moment a participant in another language understands you.

Every translation vendor publishes language counts. None publishes verifiable per-pair quality on real traffic. Why that gap matters in your next procurement evaluation — and what we publish instead.

Six weeks of shipping took InterMIND from a translation demo to a multilingual workspace. Per-viewer voice, chat, shared notes, and edit history — in 21 languages, with the audit trail to match.

Regulated teams localize controlled documents but conduct cross-site audits, CAPA reviews, and inspections in broken English. The DMS solves the document layer. InterMIND solves the conversation layer.

We're launching InterMIND: the world's first video meeting platform where everyone speaks their own language and understands each other perfectly. Free for all users until June 2026.